原文欣赏

They're not gonna get anything out of duke. Why?
他们不会从杜克那里得到什么 为什么
You said kuransky was suffering from dissociation because of being undercover, right?
你说过库里安斯基因为当卧底而得了分裂症 对吗
Yeah, yeah. Being undercover is hard to take.
对 当卧底的苦 一般人很难接受
Was it a problem for duke?
这对杜克来说是个问题吗
No, not at all.
不 完全没问题
Well, if he's a terrorist, he's been undercover longer than kuransky.
如果他真是个恐怖份子 他当卧底的时间比库里安斯基长多了
So his symptoms should be worse.
他的症状应该更严重才对
Maybe they got it wrong.
也许他们都错了
You know, maybe he's not a terrorist.
也许他并不是恐怖分子
I mean, that would explain why he didn't show any signs of deception.
这就说明为何看不出他有任何欺骗的表情
He wouldn't have been lying.
他根本就没在说谎
I've looked at over a dozen interrogations, and there's no sign of deception in duke.
我看了一堆审讯记录 没发现杜克任何的欺骗迹象
Here it is. This is the one i've been looking for.
看这里 我一直在找的这个
It's duke questioning a neo-nazi.
杜克在审问新纳粹分子的记录
I say this country is a whore bitch — De-christianized, mongrelized, obamanized.
我说这个国家就是一个肮脏的妓院 去基督化 种族杂合 奥巴马化
The streets are sewers filled with human trash. The cities reek with moral decay...
街道就像充斥着垃圾的下水道 整个城市发出道德败坏的腐臭
Look at duke. See that contempt smile?
看杜克的表情 看到那个冷笑了吗
He's offended.
他在生气
Yeah, if he were a terrorist obsessed with attacking america, he wouldn't hate this guy; he'd agree with him.
嗯 如果他是个沉迷于攻击美国的恐怖分子 他不会恨那人 他会赞同他的观点
Maybe he's not a sleeper.
也许他不是个卧底
The fbi have been investigating duke for over a year. How could they get it so wrong?
联调局调查杜克一年多 怎么还会错得如此离谱

重点讲解
一.out of：由于；缺乏；自…离开；用…（材料）
e.g.:He ordered us out of the house.
他命令我们离开这所房子。
二.suffer from：忍受，遭受；患…病；受…之苦
e.g.:Why do people suffer from phobias?
人们为什么会遭受恐惧？
三.look for：寻找
e.g.:So where should we look for happiness?
那么，我们应该去哪里寻找幸福？
四.filled with：充满
e.g.:Because you,my life is filled with hope.
因为有你,我的生命充满了希望.
五.offend：vt.冒犯, 犯罪 vi.违反, 令人不适
【词义辨析】
offend, insult
这两个动词均含“得罪或激怒某人”之意。
offend普通用词，指一般地伤害他人感情，使其不愉快。
insult语气强，指肆无忌惮地侮辱，使其难堪或羞愧。
【例句用法】
A politic man tries not to offend people.
精明的人尽量不得罪人。
No one dare to offend the fiery person.
没人敢惹这个脾气急躁的人。

剧情介绍：
为什么被指认是卧底的人反而看不出任何的欺骗迹象，而所谓的好人却破绽重重？究竟是谁冤枉了谁，还是谁误导了谁？