科学美国人60秒:误导地区情绪分析的3个单词
日期:2021-05-05 11:45

(单词翻译:单击)

z+B5%|[C3uW^5iHEr,LyU*5v7U8DIC

听力文本

Aw.lmX,IbiHN+_)D

This is Scientific American's 60-second Science. I'm Karen Hopkin.
You can tell a lot about people's general state of mind based on their social media feeds. Are they always tweeting about their biggest peeves or posting pics of particularly cute kitties? Well, in a similar fashion, researchers are turning to Twitter for clues about the overall happiness of entire geographic communities. What they're finding is that regional variation in the use of common phrases produces predictions that don't always reflect the local state of well-being. But removing from their analyses just three specific terms—good, love and LOL—greatly improves the accuracy of the methods.
"We're living in a crazy COVID-19 era. And now more than ever, we're using social media to adapt to a new normal and reach out to the friends and family that we can't meet face-to-face."
Kokil Jaidka studies computational linguistics at the National University of Singapore.
"But our words aren't useful just to understand what we, as individuals, think and feel. They're also useful clues about the community we live in."
One of the simpler methods that many scientists use to parse the data involves correlating words with positive or negative emotions. But when those tallies are compared with phone surveys that assess regional well-being, Jaidka says, they don't paint an accurate picture of the local zeitgeist.
To find out why, Jaidka and her colleague Johannes Eichstaedt of Stanford University analyzed billions of tweets from around the United States. And they found that among the most frequently used terms on Twitter are LOL, love and good.
"And they actually throw the analysis off. In fact, when we removed these three words alone, we managed to improve upon the simpler word-counting methods—and obtain better, if not perfect, estimates of happiness."

b6G&_Li,mpC

误导情绪.jpg
Why the disconnect? Well, Jaidka says one issue is...
"Internet language is really a different beast than regular spoken language. We've adapted words from the English vocabulary to mean different things in different situations."
Take, for example, LOL.
"I've tweeted the word LOL to flirt, express irony, annoyance and sometimes just pure surprise. When the methods for measuring LOL as a marker of happiness were created in the 1990s, it still meant laughing out loud."
There are plenty of terms that are less misleading, says Eichstaedt.
"Our models tell us that words like excited, fun, great, opportunity, interesting, fantastic and those are better words for measuring subjective well-being, just looking at the data."
Their work appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Being able to get an accurate read on the mood of the population is no laughing matter.
"That's particularly important now, in the time of COVID, where we're expecting a mental health crisis—and we're already seeing in survey data the largest diminishment in subjective well-being in 10 years at least, if not ever."
No doubt we could all use more fantastic opportunities for great fun and excitement—give or take the LOL.
Thanks for listening for Scientific American's 60-second Science. I'm Karen Hopkin.

!2le2GBYF.)XGDRzsaH

f5q8PI7_*JXPL.%

参考译文

Glq2kgZ!Twh3HYGX

这里是科学美国人——60秒科学1!iqs|-9=xl。我是凯伦·霍普金EEP,20#D4sUqRrZ
你可以依据人们的社交媒体信息判断出他们的到他们的一般心理状态NH@Np1+S|*~_l2y~G。他们经常发帖吐槽自已最讨厌的事吗?还是会发特别可爱的猫咪的图片?研究人员正在以类似方式,在推特上寻找关于整个地理社区的整体幸福感的线索YHdI2h]WHI。他们发现,常用短语使用的地区差异产生的预测并不总是反映当地的幸福状况mgR%,ka.e@。但只要从他们的分析中去掉“good”(好)、“love”(爱)和“LOL”(大笑)三个特定词语,研究就去的准确性就能大大提高3J(nLm48q@PErQVitj!w
“我们生活在疯狂的新冠肺炎时代;5q|oB=Cj]F#Z@u。如今我们比以往任何时候都更频繁地利用社交媒体来适应新常态,接触我们无法面对面见到的朋友和家人&BtP7*|XJf。”
在新加坡国立大学研究计算机语言学的科基尔·贾伊德卡说到@|Do-HP[&7
“但我们的词语并不仅仅用来理解我们个人的想法和感受pqW%aCNEFz=(63W2~mg。同时也是有关我们所居住社区的有用线索6dqu8*.;U7#.xG#H.x3。”
许多科学家用于分析数据的更简单方法之一是,将单词与积极或消极情绪关联起来*,t_16-~sbNxo+!。但贾伊德卡表示,在与评估地区幸福感的电话调查结果进行比较时,这些记录无法准确描述出当地的时代精神!!tB*dBlUl#TS^
为了找出原因,贾伊德卡和同事——斯坦福大学的约翰尼斯·艾希施泰德——分析了全美数十亿条推文F#Hx%NrL=Cf。他们发现推特上使用频率最高的词汇包括“LOL”、“love”和“good”!00d[[HsYU#1u
“这三个词与分析结果脱沟#5XPiizZPj。事实上,单独将这三个词去掉后,我们就改进了这种更简单的词语计算方法,并获得了更好的——也许不是完美的——幸福评估结果;%nA.Qh9Zu.Q]。”
为何会脱沟?贾伊德卡表示,一个问题是……
“网络语言和常规口语真的不同vMcv;gf3+%kcj。我们已将英语词汇中的单词改编成在不同的情况下表示不同的意思@CsZnQgnmy。”
以LOL为例3@wTUY5n[zk8Om
“我在推特上用LOL这个词来调情,表达讽刺、烦恼,有时只纯粹表示惊喜yHdSH=b[Vz。而在上世纪90年代人们将LOL作为衡量开心的标志时,这个词还只有‘放声大笑’的意思]W%p0&9FF#jJ7a.。”
艾希施泰德表示,有很多误导性较小的词语hNNi3bwVSr&J3
“我们的模型显示,仅从数据来看,‘兴奋’、‘好玩’、‘巨大的’、‘机会’、‘有趣’、‘奇妙’等词更适合衡量主观幸福感7-,[j8XrMia&。”
他们的研究成果发表在《美国国家科学院院刊》上h;!Ievcxyn#0|b=Feh
能够准确解读人们的情绪并非无关紧要9fCrmfT)y%Wg3T,K
“这在如今的新冠肺炎时代尤为重要,我们预计会出现一场精神健康危机,而且我们已经在调查数据中看到了个人幸福感下降,降幅即使不是有史以来最大的,也至少是10年来最大的tWl!16]|h*Cv55DjG^G。”
毫无疑问,我们都可以利用更多“奇妙的”“机会”来获得“巨大的”“乐趣”和“刺激”,多少都会‘放声大笑'Fv0q8qs~o_OSP[AQ|
谢谢大家收听科学美国人——60秒科学Mde5Ji94CP),r。我是凯伦·霍普金uAVB!4i7|*YMXe

&^zu_riB6*35SOK+=M

译文为可可英语翻译,未经授权请勿转载!

cr=^Yc(l]u,

h#0MVB%dGSfLq%bk~

重点讲解

y_7tY%FM6x;58f(h!K

MXfl+~MY]&EQkxWNb

重点讲解:
1. adapt to 适应;
An open-minded person is able to adapt to new conditions.
一个开明的人能够适应新情况UG^(U[x+,AwO
2. throw off 摆脱;
That will throw off your body's biomechanics.
那将会使你的身体偏离生物力学u=UYwwgdAyjwm
3. improve upon 改进;
They always look for ways to improve upon themselves and their surroundings.
他们总是想方设法提升自己、改善周围的环境.1ciUT4Iu+=n_wTGW5Bx
4. give or take 相差不到…;出入至多…;
They grow to a height of 12 ins — give or take a couple of inches.
它们会长到12英寸高——出入至多几英寸(#.2jylQVjPVw(v6]+

0YMGVRO[F^S6Ek#

%)XXmxj,CVvlJfGWz9Ar-=,fsU@Dh_hm+%BlEkZWc;GM[;QU-G
分享到