经济学人:美国终于向数字支付下手了(1)
日期:2021-04-05 18:31

(单词翻译:单击)

M1[ZU3I+c8uR=et-a6!9;3l+_mg

中英文本

K(Xd9j|&&pqI;Vf_[J&

Leaders

OO0MQvGJRW

社论

hKavStsFgR&YPH

Online commerce

IyDvz9.JVP-hfM-L%EWg

电子商务

7ISmgE2^3=t

Fintech comes to America at last

zZ[IYzjuuBJ|vb

美国终于迎来金融科技

[(|4-EWhUgiGie[TOP

A digital-payments system that favours consumers,not banks and credit-card firms, is long overdue.

ct.wYt(npjz7an3d

一个利于消费者而非银行和信用卡公司的数字支付系统早就应该出现了

G[Ah7SXp*N.C

America is home to both Silicon Valley and Wall Street, yet it has long seemed in the dark ages on digital payments. Until 2018 card purchases required hand signatures, 15 years after Europe switched to chip-and-pin. A cosy credit-card duopoly, consisting of Visa and Mastercard, works with the banks to issue cards, with the result that there has been too little competition and sky-high profit margins. Asia has leapt ahead, with pervasive, fast and dirt-cheap payments services, and a new generation of dynamic fintech firms that have rapidly reached scale. Having outdated and expensive digital financial plumbing is no mere technicality: as online shopping becomes a bigger part of everyday spending, it threatens to become a heavy tax on innovation. And it means too few people, especially in poorer households, have access to cheap and simple financial tools.

IOMI2q])Oh05

美国是硅谷和华尔街的故乡,但它似乎长期处于数字支付的黑暗时代!8FfT^,[&PlB5zq+W3。在2018年之前,在美国刷卡消费仍然需要手写签名,而欧洲在15年前就开始使用芯片卡付款系统了*icgL(J#,6bY。作为信用卡领域的两强垄断集团,Visa和万事达与银行合作发行信用卡,他们的游刃有余却造成市场缺乏竞争,利润率成了天价ik3_62#]Q6tVEUPgX&5。亚洲在数字支付已遥遥领先,实现了普遍、快速且廉价的支付方式,新一代充满活力的金融科技公司已经迅速达到规模,lG*%q^)BKXU%ZN[~x@x。过时且昂贵的数字金融体系不仅会带来技术上的问题:随着网购在日常开支中所占比重逐渐加大,它还有可能会给创新带来重负c0;&YdJLiFJE3xo。这意味着极少数人才能够获得廉价、简单的金融工具,尤其是对贫困家庭而言je^#]FOR0ExHn

kspyK&o25uU@U

im-241331.jpg

vT.OiOh~QHRGc(Q

The good news is that the picture in America is changing for the better. Thanks to the pandemic, there has been a surge in payments online and experimentation by consumers with new services provided by digital-payments firms. In the past quarter the volume of transactions on PayPal was 36% higher than a year earlier. The number of people using Square’s digital Cash App rose by 50% to 36m during 2020. Investors are now betting that these two firms, together with Stripe and Adyen (which is Dutch), form a quartet that can take on America’s stodgy financial establishment. (The chairman of The Economist’s parent group is a director of Square.) PayPal is worth $275bn, nearing Bank of America, the country’s second-biggest lender.

c[IBo0oMas|^

好消息是,美国的情况正在好转.z-|lTa^ktr%*tibXBq。多亏了新冠疫情,在线支付以及消费者尝试数字支付公司提供的新服务的次数均在激增lh5))dumVR9U84R。过去一个季度,PayPal的交易量比去年同期增长了36%X@e,bF#.)2aMC。2020年,使用Square数字现金应用程序的人数增加了50%,达到3600万aYTeOIs,%4Q+YX。投资者们估计,这两家公司连同Stripe和Adyen(荷兰公司)打算四家联手与美国古板的金融机构展开较量w7TelRq!ApQCAj=]uTKJ。(《经济学人》母公司的董事长是Square的董事之一9_m+=_&UQ#7XD。)PayPal市值2750亿美元,接近美国第二大银行美国银行的市值,bMZM]w5rP.j

RsGqsbI;soO

Yet there is a catch. Despite the rise of innovative firms, fees for American consumers have yet to fall by much. Square charges 2.6% on the average transaction; Stripe’s fee nears 3%. By contrast, China’s big fintech firms charge below 0.5%. Fees have been kept low by a fierce price war.

|a3^~j;Q@z=]XH37E*g

但有一个陷阱S%J=_Bh&xa。尽管创新型公司不断崛起,但美国消费者的手续费仍没有大幅下降9!DfE|AC84iT-OYmk。Square在平均每笔交易中收取2.6%的手续费;Stripe的收费接近3%Gkvq%rjmJ6TUZ@Bi;。相比之下,中国大型金融科技公司的收费低于0.5%eyzmBR=wmTSGxf!#FLbY。由于激烈的价格战,中国收取的手续费一直很低U%HvJp*@n#|Viid[eJc

gWBJ(.Hgob8

译文由可可原创,仅供学习交流使用,未经许可请勿转载iSmxA6+2gS)]Cwm3W0%

ma83t5TcEO4h

词语解释

7nP-E!bhiU6


imHtt@PD)S*-

1. And it means too few people, especially in poorer households, have access to cheap and simple financial tools.

.y;4Q90-Y5yGf

have access to 得接近;得会见;得进入

Y[V|9,ECrm9^c~S70

All the rooms have access to the Internet.

E7Vbf^6-)EA5ae=&b

所有的房间都可以接入互联网+!Vc1(3fxe5P*q4nv|pM

%PFc_N;5uP

2. By contrast, China’s big fintech firms charge below 0.5%.

DnPJ.~Z%&TT

by contrast 相比之下

0YBoTnAX96ik,

The private sector, by contrast, has plenty of money to spend

h3g*dTb@jaJ,-wROW!t

相比之下,私营部门就有很多钱可供开销eD8L~0n[-n#W,=W*

]kc|[1m-oS[NkF@YMtEW64CF~KL,^J%8DJVgq6uv9*](xC*j3S
分享到