经济学人:律师事务所 标价更高 收益更少
日期:2014-01-22 16:15



Law firms
Charging more, getting less
Lawyers' biggest customers are discovering that they can haggle
THERE were groans in big companies' legal departments in the mid-2000s, when the fees of America's priciest lawyers first hit 1,000 an hour.
Such rates have since become common at firms with prestige.

A survey published this week by the National Law Journal found that they now go as high as 1,800.
But the general counsels of large businesses are increasingly finding that they can ignore these extravagant rates, and insist on big discounts.
Price-discounting tends to be associated more with used-car lots than with posh law firms. There was a time when a lawyer could submit his bill and be confident of receiving a cheque for the same amount.
In banner years, some even got more, as grateful clients tipped them a little extra for a job well done.
Since the financial crisis, however, the realisation of law firms—the proportion of their standard rates that they collect in practice—has been sliding.
Earlier this month Peer Monitor, a company that tracks the legal industry, said that the ratio in the United States dropped from 92% in 2007 to an all-time low of 83.5% in 2013.
本月初,一家跟踪报道法律产业的公司,Peer Monitor表示,在美国,价格比率已由07年的92%下滑到空前低值,13年的83.5%。
British lawyers have seen a similar decline.
Discounts are rampant, says Brad Hildebrandt, a consultant to law firms.
折扣现象在蔓延。一家律师律师事务所的顾问Brad Hildebrandt如是说。
The economic forces driving high-flying legal eagles into the bargain bin are no mystery.
Demand for corporate legal work on such things as mergers, takeovers and share and bond issues plummeted in the 2008-09 recession, and has yet to recover.
Simultaneously, the easy profits once earned in litigation departments have also dried up: the tedious task of reviewing mountains of documents, which law firms used to farm out to battalions of newly qualified associates, can increasingly be done by computers.
Putting up prices at a time of weak demand and fierce competition seems perverse.
Yet the industry has continued to increase its sticker prices by 2-3% every year—only to give back almost all the gain by offering ever-greater discounts.
One reason for this is that, as ever more big clients discover they can haggle, law firms have realised that the best way for them to start the negotiation is with the highest possible asking-price.
In this, lawyers now find themselves in the same boat as accountants and other professionals who have long been used to having to bargain with bigger customers.
Another reason is that sophisticated legal services are somewhat like luxury cars and handbags, in that a high asking-price is taken as a sign of quality.
No one wants to have hired the cheaper firm in a high-stakes lawsuit.
But perhaps the most important rationale for discounting is that it lets law firms charge different prices to different clients, depending on their willingness to pay.
And even among business clients with big budgets, this varies markedly.
Over the past 25 years some large companies have built up their in-house legal departments, so that these can now deal with outside law firms on an equal footing.
In-house lawyers know the market value of every type of service, and have sophisticated software that scrutinises invoices and queries anomalies.
Such clients no longer just take the law firm's word for how many hours its lawyers spent on a job: if the bill looks padded, they will not hesitate to demand cuts.
DuPont, a chemicals giant, has found plenty of scope for curbing its legal bills by becoming a cannier client.
In the early 1990s it spread its legal work among 350 firms.
Now it uses only 38—including some smaller firms in smaller cities, which offer better value for money.
DuPont has persuaded its remaining law firms to work together more closely.
For routine work it insists on flat fees; for riskier cases it seeks no-win, no-fee agreements.
Above all, says Thomas Sager, DuPont's general counsel, We had to communicate that this is a new day, and you need to be as committed to our financial success as you are to yours.
特别是,杜邦的总顾问Thomas Sager说:我们不得不相互传达‘今天是新的一天,你必须坚定的为我们的经济成功努力,就如同你对自己的那样'的信息。
Law firms' profits would evaporate if they offered smaller and less sophisticated clients such attractive deals.
Fortunately for them, they have so far been able to get away with offering discreet, selective discounts.
There are still a few big clients around who do not realise what they are missing:
If you increase the rate every year, some clients will make you take it back, but others will let you keep it, says Tony Williams, a former managing partner of Clifford Chance, one of Britain's biggest law firms.
如果每年都提高价格,一些顾客会让你收回该要求,但是另外一些会答应你的条件。高伟绅—英国最大律师事务所之一的总顾问Tony Williams如是说。

1.insist on 坚持,一定要

Customize the product or insist on the cookie-cutter model?

I insist on quietness in my room.

2.be confident of 对…事有信心,确信…

Only thus can you be confident of yourself.

My father has helped me to be confident of being myself as well.

3.use to 过去常常

Below are different strategies you can use to help you deal with each of these negative emotions.

Mining has led to water polluted by mercury which miners use to separate the metal from river sediment.

4.give back 归还,恢复;后退

You could give back the money you owe me.

What a nice way to give back to the community and help others!

  • committedadj. 献身于某种事业的,委托的
  • luxuryn. 奢侈,豪华,奢侈品
  • proportionn. 比例,均衡,部份,(复)体积,规模 vt. 使成比
  • ignorevt. 不顾,不理,忽视
  • evaporatev. 蒸发,失去水分,消失
  • willingnessn. 乐意,愿意
  • prestigen. 威望,声望
  • collectv. 收集,聚集 v. 推论 adv. 接收者付款
  • lawsuitn. 诉讼,控诉
  • qualifiedadj. 有资格的,有限制的