我们能否控制人工智能?
日期:2018-08-31 06:44

(单词翻译:单击)

 MP3点击下载
iSMoLDdFnffmRzv,H0&xsF*GH#BuMWwDv6MI

I’m optimistic that we can create an awesome future with technology

7k^u]F~ru7O3o[DzD@td

我相信我们可以用科技创造出美好的未来

WPeGnS1P2;MEyyG6+c

as long as we win the race between the growing power of the tech and the growing wisdom with which we manage the tech.

M4Q]ZYuqeg=b3iS~q

只要我们赢得科技发展和智慧进步之间的这场比赛

UY-+@B2;OHKR!Z

This is actually getting harder because of nerdy technical developments in the AI field.

&nQnb9n5+.LzZCRucsyX

这一点其实越来越难 因为人工智能(AI)领域那些奇怪的技术发展

gg|mMeoio]8+r

It used to be, when we wrote state-of-the-art AI—

jv5sj*8]=Ly;

曾经 当我们写下最先进的AI时——

bue_#&ilXwIpV#5h

like for example IBM’s Deep Blue computer who defeated Gary Kasparov in chess a couple of decades ago—

y-8m4rF)!%WHoNF(uwH

比如几十年前在国际象棋中战胜了加里·卡斯帕罗夫的国际商业机器公司的深蓝电脑——

T!JY.=*S@2hgbn

that all the intelligence was basically programmed in by humans who knew how to play chess

dn(o-Ap4|njw_(~

它所有的智力都是由会下象棋的人类通过编程输进去的

Xd%6#m3mhauRI=8f+x

and then the computer won the game just because it could think faster and remember more.

W3BQvZ1qa)mja

电脑之所以能赢得比赛只是因为它的思考速度更快 脑容量更大

9bZu1Ua3bzYEjDd|y*Dc

167.png

tspz8ix=5,


Zpd,[08mHtrWo%Gg!

But we understood the software well.

3ronVN1L[eaZ7k

但我们很了解软件

RIfE~1Ry3|]rZEbpZ

Understanding what your AI system does is one of those pieces of wisdom you have to have to be able to really trust it.

RpIv7GK;[;0jm5

了解AI系统的功能是你能真正相信它的智慧之一

!Ksx]zpd#YykH

The reason we have so many problems today with systems getting hacked or crashing because of bugs

ltqf4FB@gQ;kFkC7hb

今天我们的系统会被入侵或者因故障而崩溃

Y*5]uaiU1MHfOm

is exactly because we didn’t understand the systems as well as we should have.

d8q(diUe54XE+z4

这些问题都是因为我们对系统的了解还不够

Rso3s!iA0C~9fZzu|G=

Now what’s happening is fascinating, today’s biggest AI breakthroughs are a completely different kind

]E1o46DH]T^-s7-+

现在的情况很有趣 如今AI最大的突破完全不同

Eq[i=X~z~fUvRK#ge

where rather than the intelligence being largely programmed in an easy-to-understand code,

=xbIk(ThN2P)NL[L

我们不再需要把智力编成通俗易懂的代码

^ljJ|!xb@X~b@

you put in almost nothing except a little learning rule by which a simulated arc of neurons can take a lot of data and figure out how to get stuff done.

r%n9M]y%m[&Xbj

而是只需要输入一个小小的学习规则 模拟神经元可以通过这个规则获取大量数据并解决问题

&HAto+*|Bvcc12tG]A

This deep learning suddenly becomes able to do things often even better than the programmers were ever able to do.

B)h=u2FNPdTki%

突然间 这种深度学习解决问题的能力比程序员还要强

H||pm!.@_dZ

You can train a machine to play computer games with almost no hard-coded stuff at all.

Hy@M;us+dQZ@r)Yrt4

你可以用几乎没有硬编码的方式教会机器玩电脑游戏

!@we*Z=9Vv0og3Q^&L

You don’t tell it what a game is, what the things are on the screen, or even that there is such a thing as a screen—

D7Pp,yAVn*L

你不需要告诉电脑这是什么游戏 不用告诉它屏幕上是什么 甚至都不用让它知道还有屏幕这种东西——

agb8+]B93Qt;,PC

you just feed in a bunch of data about the colors of the pixels and tell it,

mT4Cm2QOj79+R]e

你只需要输入一堆关于像素颜色的数据 然后告诉它

1MpaeW[9JFttg0#L_|.

“Hey go ahead and maximize that number in the upper left corner,”

W=*,J]i,~2W[-I%l.B@

“嘿 在左上角把这个数字最大化”

1MXJtUgx6.#l*;b=HuH

and gradually you come back and it’s playing some game much better than I could.

GV4f,3+)yhfRiOIE[le*

慢慢地你会发现 它游戏玩得比你好很多

CSE!0TimyGV[pnT!

The challenge with this, even though it’s very powerful, this is very much “blackbox” now where,

W1I-yPLWW!mSC^

虽然它很强大 但问题在于 这个东西很“黑箱化”

CH_Kq=UyvCJ*a&tCM2w

yeah it does all that great stuff—and we don’t understand how.

G8m.x]Q2PbB&GaI

没错 它能做很多了不起的事——但我们不理解它是怎么做到的

ySua;zNAswBYUD

So suppose I get sentenced to ten years in prison by a Robojudge in the future and I ask, “Why?”

yZ6h[OH1S#G2_F

假设未来我被一名机器人法官判决入狱10年 我问它“为什么”

8xb[AarkMW5+n@sF2FqG

And I’m told, “I WAS TRAINED ON SEVEN TERABYTES OF DATA, AND THIS WAS THE DECISION,”

iV)y~Yg=7~y_

它告诉我“我曾经受训的是数据的七兆兆字节 这就是最终决定”

c)kQ1I+YkTuvKn|;*]

It’s not that satisfying for me.

Hw]9-)7@*1D

我对这个答案可不满意

&1knz=VOQ*et!#@I6^+0

Or suppose the machine that’s in charge of our electric power grid suddenly malfunctions and someone says,

*z+@Lrplt41Zc(g%F-v

或者假设控制我们电力网格的机器突然出现了故障 有人说

Sj6@(~~5SMtTQ3y1

“Well, we have no idea why. We trained it on a lot of data and it worked,”

yw]uZm*;*#N

“我们不知道为啥 我们给它训练过很多数据 都没问题”

eMTx|CZ1ZlmVgj

that doesn’t instill the kind of trust that we want to put into systems.

W5!lR57&,3!A

这可不会增加我们对系统的信任

S4c-gjfVVUH(5s3cq

When you get the blue screen of death when your Windows machine crashes or the spinning wheel of doom because your Mac crashes,

|AQ^nnlMYH80]

当你的电脑蓝屏死机 当你的Windows系统崩溃 或者是你的Mac崩溃只剩下转动之轮的时候

15uIF1t8b2HC#;Xc

“annoying” is probably the main emotion we have,

ldOU7&;sm~!_ONS(9T

“烦躁”可能是我们产生的主要情绪

yiz1f[Tq&ZYZ

but “annoying” isn’t the emotion we have if it’s myself flying an airplane and it crashes,

|Ex+TVP)RM[mf,=FP2

但如果是我们自己开的飞机坠机了

3(X@7[zl&;H)Uxd

or the software controlling the nuclear arsenal of the U.S., or something like that.

%AU3VxBxWBDpEh

或者软件控制了美国的核武库等等 我们定然不会“烦躁”

|gJKTq!#JjIIve~+PO*

And as AI gets more and more out into the world

];tbqKSLMSOp-LOq(

随着AI越来越多地进入人们的生活

Co[l5n3kt6Bu.E&9E

we absolutely need to transform today’s packable and buggy AI systems into AI systems that we can really trust.

2|Y#DbW%.O.vuh2,q+Z

我们绝对需要把现在可打包的、漏洞多的AI系统转变成真正能让我们信任的AI系统

bNLnxqvvCtsEcSwV+T8t%|LmyrkL*rw[65HnS
分享到