美国在情报上的巨额投资是否有必要?
日期:2018-03-12 15:36

(单词翻译:单击)

 MP3点击下载
*I3XF[_dY[=W*(Jp%62^lRf1mY3ZIbL

It is an unclassified number—and has been for several years—what the United States spends on intelligence every year.

S2EXD|dom~be#OROUTz

这个数据不保密——很多年来都是这样——就是美国每年花在情报上的钱

qO;Mt.r]a_Z#-kGyhUWE

It’s an unclassified number.

(TkDq(d.oaq_8_

这个数据是公开的

8kdid+38dIFu

They don’t really break out what they’re spending it for, they break it out only in terms of two categories: “general intelligence” and military intelligence.

i(T7H-J(#X(8

他们并不会公布详细的开销列表 只是把它简单地分为两类:“一般情报”和军事情报

e1|8l4symGroNF*0[6s

And the totals for many years now have been around $70 billion. 7-0 billion dollars. $70 billion.

ZznU.bDX1KLfLHn&LQ

多年来花在这两项上的情报开支大约是700亿美元 七百亿 700亿美元

(cNd~01[.7iY

About 20 billion for military, which helps you fight, about 50 billion, “just because”, to surveil the world.

S2FRd.udK|tbDQ;6mj-

其中军事情报开销占200亿 这有助于我们进行战斗 还有500亿花在“所谓的”监控世界上

*8f|86=doU.|WE

Now I have to say, I’m skeptical that we need to spend $70 billion on intelligence.

)E,45-xfy4dEqwyZ

我不得不怀疑 我们是否真的需要在情报上花费700亿美元

F=gM1c~o&ZkI

116.png

(yY*B#!(,g_b


jI9.@O-,h-a;j;XEF

I’m skeptical about what some of this intelligence is buying and doing. I’m skeptical.

s-WfvF;kEddP(we;w|Lq

我怀疑这些情报到底买了什么做了什么 我很怀疑

#l7~E4E,JCrDfH)VEafS

Intelligence in general is what you need for defense or offense, you need it for restraint, you need it for hegemony.

^HU.E8|7x_)S,

一般来说 情报是用来防御或进攻的 你需要它进行克制 也需要它扩张霸权

d3acMMD6!1=CF6Se

Intelligence you need to run a great power strategy.

DV5DfbAmIsbhr

想要国家强大 就得需要情报

uu_H|E13m2;ZG4xVw]

But I’d like to unpack what it is that we’re doing a little bit better, and look at some of these activities and ask “is this really necessary?”

AvML^(ae1rG@W[

不过我想来说一下我们到底在干什么 看看我们所做的这些事 然后问一下“这真的有必要吗?”

j*fk)Cl&i@)PDmH[W

Because my impression is we pretty much spy on everything given the chance: friends, enemies, whomever.

CoYry_sZzbCp&Vc3=2Eh

因为我感觉只要有机会 我们会对身边的一切进行监控:朋友 敌人 任何人

W.YsD1[tX@&2GezzGf(

During the peak of our 9/11 anger and hurt we spied on ourselves.

ReEsqHos3FhZF=8,|

在911事件的愤怒和痛苦高峰期 我们连自己都监视

sU~fVntbX[qLJ;Z5q7LO

And we spied on ourselves without really sorting out the legal ramifications of it.

NaQsPMAOJy;jed

我们监控自己的时候根本没有合法非法之分

CH8fyx!;vG2WNMq3gBTI

We collected vast amounts of metadata, stored it.

l.W^xT6M&1

我们收集了海量的元数据 存储起来

u9k@F2Z]I!

This is spying on Americans!

bt-eKv*9D08f=E(1

这是对全美国人的监视!

V2c60w(PxO

We’re doing a little bit less of it now, but it’s not very hard for an American who has friends abroad to get caught up in surveillance.

=va8Z5lpA0x+jF0

现在稍微好点了 不过要想监控一个朋友在国外的美国人也不是那么困难

1,f8ThjZqPO|

There’s just a lot of collection, a lot of collection.

iC,NN6sSrR

我们就只是收集数据 大量的数据

B63ULc)La6T

And a lot of this information is stored so that if something happens, the IC, using fancy algorithms,

m+JMJeIMw2L.OQsm,1

有很多这样的信息被存储起来 如果出事了 集成电路就会使用高级算法

z7yaRL.iV5_Fq^

can backtrack communications among individuals to figure out who was implicated and who knew who.

+ujC;PEIP0

追踪人与人之间的联系 搞清楚谁是罪魁祸首以及人们的社交关系

;wd;!N4gXV!W

If you have the big library and you have the guilty party, you can then reverse engineer to try and figure out who else was implicated.

D!&,9S434nE1_,JI8YFD

如果你有很大的数据库 还找到了犯罪人 你就能往回追溯 找到还有谁牵涉其中

DlFHCjik=cXX.W^R~*V

It doesn’t prevent the terrorist attack, but it does allow you to prosecute the group.

sV|rkEz.1+

这无法阻止恐怖袭击 但却能帮你找到犯罪团伙

Dfx2RQk_MwQqwsc591Z

But all the rest of us end up compromising our privacy for this purpose, and we have to... this is another thing where we should have a conversation.

sA9TVN0VN3N

但就为这一点 其他所有人都被迫放弃自己的隐私 我们得...这是另一件需要讨论的事

h20)St!l~xL

And it’s not an easy and straightforward conversation, because some people would privilege safety and say “Fine, they can have that metadata on me, the traffic, the numbers I called.

~Xg(X=17w0~

这个对话没那么简单明了 因为有些人更注重安全 会说“好吧 他们可以拿走我的数据 交通 我打的电话

W)#q]xy0zH,

As long as they’re not collecting the text of my phone calls they can collect the origins of my phone calls and emails, keep them in a library anonymized until they need to de-anonymize them.”

[ZsQd-#+R.@

只要他们不收集我的通话文本 就可以拿走我通话和邮件的原始脚本 把它们匿名存在数据库里 需要的时候再解匿”

=#Bs_hAP8k|,Ru

Some people say “Fine, if that’s what we need to be able to backtrack a terrorist event and break up a network.”

7_7e@^Hz.Bi

有人会说“好吧 如果他们需要这些信息去追踪恐怖袭击 打破社交圈子”

0iVFeE;Gxe|4lg.k(us=

They’re fine with that. I’m a little uncomfortable with it, I have to say.

ya6kRFk0Ycj|(

他们不介意 不过我得说 我自己不太喜欢这样

bsWR~]N#d%#xTe~OBf

But I don’t think it’s an open and shut straightforward matter, I think these things about the magnitude of the American intelligence effort worldwide,

Gzx3TG~&~XVF(5iF%0

但我觉得这并不是非黑即白的简单问题 我觉得美国在世界情报方面所下的功夫

Om+yUNMAh4P

what that effort was focusing on, how much information it ends up collecting at home—this is something that really needs to be discussed,

K6uNZ]tMR7nd=rvAbFJ~

他们的关注点 它在国内收集了多少信息——这些是很值得讨论的问题

DeB7!_o^IlvNP.sHs=

because I think it has something to do with American liberties.

zisuKY^WkuC2

因为这与美国人的自由息息相关

QD=xwji-FOIbO]S|&*w

And so, this is not particularly what I spend my days doing, but I have some...

f!P-Mre;#g

我并不是一天到晚都在干这些事 但我有...

AU~(7182FWJQqAonmcT

I do feel uneasy about it, and I do tend to believe that the more active we are in international politics, the more this machine grinds on,

rA|m4nB18R&Hs

我真的不喜欢这样 我觉得我们在国际政治上越活越 这台机器就运作地越频繁

wyNDz0f.ZGz5#VgD

the more we collect abroad, the more we’re going to collect at home,

I-.^;nm;v+

我们在国外收集的信息越多 在国内收集的信息也会越多

_mwpU1@a0,0)FJ-ola

and the bigger the kind of amorphous mass of information waiting to be misused by someone is, and that’s the thing that kind of concerns me.

oTWoETL~Q|UA);*fR(

那么也会有越来越多的无定形信息被某些人非法滥用 这一点让我颇为担忧

CCA%qN&]3D@;|_*CB!!W_J2Llp7=[*q74jQ5%_t]*kY
分享到
重点单词
  • collectv. 收集,聚集 v. 推论 adv. 接收者付款
  • collectionn. 收集,收取,聚集,收藏品,募捐
  • figuren. 图形,数字,形状; 人物,外形,体型 v. 演算,
  • tendv. 趋向,易于,照料,护理
  • offensen. 过错,冒犯,触怒,犯规,犯罪,进攻
  • defensen. 防卫,防卫物,辩护 vt. 防守
  • privacyn. 隐私,隐居,秘密
  • prosecutevt. 对 ... 提起公诉,彻底进行,追捕,经营,从事
  • straightforwardadj. 笔直的,率直的
  • preventv. 预防,防止