If you were starting a top university today, what would it look like? you would start by gathering very best minds from around the world, from every discipline.(1)____ since we're living in an age of abundant, riot scarcely, information you' d curate the lectures carefully, with a focus on the new and original, rather than offer a course on every possible topic.(2)____ you’ d create a sustainable economic model by focusing on technological rather than physical infrastructure, and by getting people of mean to pay for a specialized experience.(3)____ you' d also construct a robust network so people could access to resources whenever and from wherever they like, and you'd give them the tools to collaborate beyond the lecture hall.(4)____ why not fulfill the university millennium-old mission by sharing ideas freely and as widely as possible?(5)____(6)____If you did all that, well, you'd have ted.
Its 'faculty': a roster of speakers that run from bill clinton to j.j. abrams, from desmond tutu to isabel allende-anyone who's driving change across the globe.(7)____ their topics range from biophysics to graphic design, covering all what roman playwright terentius might have had on mind when he said, "nothing human is alien to me."(8)____(9)____ the economic model? with attendance fees, advertising, and corporate sponsorships, ted ran an operating surplus of more than $2 million last year, which was reinvested into expanding its reach that's because like fearful old-school colleges, ted is finding that the more open it is, the more it becomes the global education brand of the 21st century.(10)____
3．mean→means词汇错误。a man of means表示“富人”，means意为“收入，财富”，此处mean要用复数形式。
6．∧freely→as词汇错误。本句的意思是“为什么不通过尽可能自由和广泛地分享想法来履行大学千年来的使命？”此处是as... as possible的结构，表示“尽可能……”，故应采用as freely的形式，与as widely并列。
7．run→runs语法错误。句中主语是faculty，a roster of speakers是同位语。谓语动词需用第三人称单数形式，run要改成runs。
9．on→in词汇错误。have sth. in mind是固定搭配，表示“记住某事”，介词on应改为in。
10.like→unlike语篇错误。上文一直在讲开放式教育，此处提到的old-school colleges指的是传统教育，下文的the more open就明显表明开放式教育与传统教育酌不同了，此处应该将like换成unlike。