(单词翻译:单击)
But at the same time, this technology’s happening so quickly and the performance improvements are so large that you need to figure something out.
与此同时，这项技术发展得如此之快，性能改进如此之大，你需要想清楚一些问题。
And you can’t wait by just running a strategy document and seeing what happens in the industry.
你不能等着通过运行一份战略文件，来看这个行业的发展前景。
I would think about what is our crash research program and how this works for us?
我会思考我们濒临崩溃的研究规划是什么，以及它如何为我们工作？
Who in our organization is experimenting with this?
我们企业中谁在对此进行试验?
Should we offer some sort of insanely large prize and have everyone spend four hours next Monday hacking away at how they can automate their jobs with ChatGPT and giving large cash prizes to the people who come up with the best ideas?
我们是否应该提供巨额奖金，让每个人下周一都花四个小时研究如何用ChatGPT实现工作自动化，并为想出最佳创意的人提供巨额现金奖励?
There is no outside organization to turn to here.This is a company thing.
目前没有外部组织可以求助。这是公司内部的事情。
I think people really need to assess their exposure to this and understand where it can benefit them.
我认为人们真的需要评估使用ChatGPT的情况，了解它能在哪里使他们受益。
The way you describe that, it sounds like companies that have a pretty strong innovation framework and ways to bring it out within the organization are going to be better set up to get rolling with this.
从你描述的方式来看，听起来那些拥有强有力创新框架、以及掌握了企业内部的使用方法的公司，将会更好地开展这项工作。
I don’t mean to keep saying the same answer, but we actually don’t know. The issue is that because as we talked about earlier on, this is really an individual interaction?
我不想一直说同样的答案，但实际上我们不知道答案。问题是，因为我们之前说过，这真的是一种个人互动吗?
You basically gained a teammate, everybody did, an infinitely sort of patient intern that sometimes lies to you.
每个人基本上像是获得了一个队友，一个偶尔会骗你的但拥有无限耐心的实习生。
What do you do with that? Is a question that it’s not clear a traditional innovation framework is as helpful because your R&D team, wherever that is, doesn’t have an advantage over a line manager who’s using this or a customer service rep who’s using this.
你用它做什么? 这个问题是，传统的创新框架是否有用还不清楚，因为无论身处何处，研发团队都不比使用该程序的部门经理或客服代表的个人有优势。
You used the word crash before. Should some companies even be in triage mode? Like, this is bring back the war room from the pandemic?
你前面用过crash这个词。一些公司甚至进入伤员验伤分类模式? 像是将人们从疫情中又带回了作战室?
I think this is as big a deal in the medium term.
我认为从中期来看，这也是一件大事。
I absolutely think you should be, right?
我绝对认为你应该使用它，对吧?
Pick a topic, idea generation, writing, what’s happening there and then what’s the sort of red team approach?
选择主题，生成想法，写作，发生了什么？红队的方法是什么?
How could other people use this to attack your business model?
其他人如何利用这个应用来攻击你的商业模式?
And so I think that this is a war room situation because the situation’s evolving so quickly that I think it’s very possible for you to kind of wait and use your usual approach to new technology and be cynical about this.
我认为这个情形像是作战室，因为形势发展如此之快，我认为你很可能会等待，使用以往的方法来对待新技术，并对此冷嘲热讽。
And I totally get why people would be cynical about the latest new tech and miss the opportunity in front of us.
我完全理解为什么人们会对最近的新技术冷嘲热讽，从而错过我们面前的机会。
How do you as an organization start using this technology fairly? Should workers have to use it if they haven’t already started?
作为一个企业，如何开始公平地使用这项技术? 如果企业还没有开始，员工应该使用它吗?
I don’t know about forcing people to use it, especially if there’s no corporate use case.
我对强迫员工使用这项技术一无所知，特别是如果没有企业用例的话。
The policy will come from the use case and in cases where there’s high levels of accuracy required, then the current versions of Chat are probably not going to be what you need,
策略将来自用例，在对准确性要求很高的情况下，当前版本的聊天可能不是您所需要的，
but already, for example, some of the fine-tuned models like Google’s medical model is giving, in another controlled study, is giving advice that’s at least equal to that of doctors to patients with common illnesses and other doctors are rating the answers from the medical AI as being less dangerous than the answers from other doctors.
例如，一些经过微调的模型，如谷歌的医疗模型。在一项对照研究中，谷歌医疗模型为患有普通疾病的患者提供的建议至少与医生的建议相同，而其他医生则认为医疗人工智能的答案比其他医生的答案更危险。
There’s going to be specialized disruption coming next, which is part of why I think the general-purpose technology needs to be understood so quickly.
接下来会出现专门的破坏，这也是为什么我认为通用技术需要迅速被理解的部分原因。
