Spanish business school Iese has topped the Financial Times 2015 combined ranking of executive short courses, regaining the position it last held in 2012. The school ousted HEC Paris, which dropped to second place in the combined table.
西班牙Iese商学院在英国《金融时报》2015年高管短期课程综合排行榜上拔得头筹，该学校上次获得这一殊荣是在2012年。去年排名第一的法国巴黎高等商学院(HEC Paris)今年屈居第二。
Iese’s particular achievement was coming top of the ranking for customised programmes — those aimed at corporate customers. The school is only the fifth to top the customised ranking. It puts an end to 12 years of domination by Duke Corporate Education. Before that, the last winner was New York’s Columbia Business School in 2002. Duke drops to third overall after falling more than 10 places in five criteria, including “follow-up”, in which it dropped 27 places to 40th.
Iese商学院尤为突出的成绩表现在，登上了针对企业客户的定制课程排行榜的榜首。该学院是第5个登顶该排行榜的学校。它结束了杜克企业教育学院(Duke Corporate Education)长达12年的霸主地位。在此之前，2002年的冠军是纽约哥伦比亚大学商学院(Columbia Business School)。杜克企业教育学院的此项排名滑落至第三，在5项指标中的排名下滑超过10位（其中在“后续跟进”指标上的排名下滑27位，至第40名）。

The Financial Times executive education rankings, now in their 17th year, rate the best 75 open programmes and the best 85 customised programmes worldwide. Executive education offers non-degree programmes, either tailor-made for corporate customers (customised) or available to all working managers (open). The rankings are based on participants’ and clients’ satisfaction, the diversity of participants and faculty, and the schools’ international exposure.
英国《金融时报》高管教育排行榜已进入第17个年头，排行榜选出全球75项最佳开放课程以及85项最佳定制课程，并对它们进行排名。高管教育提供非学位课程，要么是针对企业客户的定制课程，要么是针对所有在职管理人员的开放课程。排名基于学员和客户的满意度、学员和师资的多样性以及学校的国际交流活跃度。
Iese, third in the customised ranking for the past three years, overtook HEC Paris, the runner-up since 2009, and made it to the top of the ranking for the first time. Iese is rewarded for performing consistently well across all 15 criteria. While the school is ranked first for faculty diversity only, it is in the top 10 for all remaining criteria. It is second for preparation and third for programme design and value for money.
过去3年在定制课程排行榜上一直位居第三的Iese，取代自2009年一直稳居亚军位置的法国巴黎高等商学院，首次在该排行榜上登顶。Iese获此殊荣的原因是，其在所有15项指标中取得了统一的良好成绩。该学院仅在师资多样性方面排名第一，在其他所有指标上均排在前10名。该学院在筹备指标上排名第二，在课程设计和性价比上排名第三。
This is Iese’s best performance overall across the two rankings. In addition to being number one for customised programmes, it is third for open-enrolment programmes.
今年是Iese在两个排行榜上总体表现最好的一年。除了在定制课程排行榜上位居冠军之外，Iese在开放注册课程中排名第三。
Other notable performances in the customised programme rankings include ESCP Europe of France, which enjoyed the biggest jump, up 28 places to 28th. Olin Business School at Washington University had the biggest fall, dropping 31 places to 55th. The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania recorded its worst performance, down 21 places to 47th. Nine schools were ranked for the first time. Antai College of Economics and Management at Shanghai Jiao Tong University was the highest entrant, in 15th position.
在定制课程排行榜上，其他表现突出的学校包括ESCP欧洲商学院(ESCP Europe)，该学院排名上升幅度最大，上升28位，至第28名。华盛顿大学(Washington University)奥林商学院(Olin Business School)排名降幅最大，下降31位，至第55名。今年是宾夕法尼亚大学(University of Pennsylvania)沃顿商学院(Wharton School)表现最差的一年，它的排名下滑21位，至第47名。有9所商学院是首次上榜。上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院(Antai College of Economics and Management)是排名最高的新上榜学校，排在第15位。
The ranking of 75 open-enrolment programmes was led by IMD of Switzerland for the fourth year running. HEC Paris moved up one place to second, while Iese came third.
在75项开放注册课程排行榜上，瑞士的国际管理发展学院(IMD)连续第四年荣登榜首。法国巴黎高等商学院的排名上升一个位置，成为亚军，Iese位居第三。
Fundação Dom Cabral of Brazil, a former top 10 school, showed one of the biggest improvements, rising 11 places to 12th. Cambridge Judge Business School was ranked highest among the six new entrants, in 50th place.
巴西Fundação Dom Cabral是排名上升最快的学校之一，在该项排名中上升11个位置，至第12名，之前该校曾跻身前10名。剑桥大学贾奇商学院(Cambridge Judge Business School)在6所新上榜院校中排名最高，位列第50名。
Schools’ main asset is their faculty. Faculty are rated highest in both open and customised programmes according to the quality of their teaching, the coherence of their courses and their approachability.
各商学院的主要优势是教师。师资力量在开放课程和定制课程中的得分均为最高，得分基于授课质量、课程连贯性以及教师的亲和力。
Follow-up after courses, on the other hand, is the weakest area for both types of programmes. Formal support in open programmes was given the lowest rating, of 7.6 out of 10. Ease of implementation was also a key concern. “The course I attended was not easily tailored to my needs,” said one senior manager of a leadership course. “More tailoring of tools to assist in follow-up and implementation would have be useful.”
课程结业后的后续跟进在两类课程中则均为最薄弱环节。开放课程在正式支持指标中的得分最低，为7.6分（总分10分）。执行的容易程度也是一个主要问题。“我参加的课程不容易被定制为符合我需求的样子，”参加了一门领导力课程的一位高级管理人员表示，“对工具进行更多定制，以协助后续跟进和执行将是有用的。”
Nonetheless, the vast majority of participants reported their course met their personal and professional expectations and said they would strongly recommend it. Corporate customers were equally satisfied: two-thirds said they would use the same school again for the same programme.
然而，大部分学员表示，他们参加的课程达到了个人和职业预期，他们将强烈推荐这些课程。企业客户也同样满意：三分之二的受访者表示，将在学习同类课程时再次选择目前的学校。