【写作话题】
The computer are widely used in education and some people think teacher are not play important role in the classroom . to what extend do you agree?(agree/disagree)

【写作范文】

范文9

　　As the most important invention in the 21 century,computers have windspread in the world,and the use of it has become the necessity of various spheres both in our work and in our daily life. although computers are also greatly utilized in the education field,teachers are still playing a crucial part on the platform. personally,i believe that teachers should not be replaced by computers due to the following reasons.

　　being the architect of humanbeings' moral, teachers shoulder the responsibilities of passing knowledge to students as well as shaping them to be real men with good qualities. students may learn some certain knowledge from computers which are cold and senseless, but good qualities can only be taught by teachers.

　　at the same time,computers might not give detailed and understandable elaboration of complicated theories. after judging whether the answers are right or wrong computers fail to tell them why they make such mistakes. the problems can only be dealt with by teachers.

　　in addition,some elementary academic exchanges,such as discussion and association,cannot be organised by computers.nevertheless, teachers make up the deficiendy.by this means,students' learning enthusiasm is greatly activated.

　　above all,computers bring about many significant revolutions in the education field,but teachers are still the hosts of the classroom.we should always bear in mind that men are the owner of technology and no matter how intelligent the computers are,they are merely man-made machines.

　　范文10

　　Along with the mass use of computer technology in education circles, we are delighted to witness the uncountable conveniences be brought by computer. Some people even argue that teacher will not be important in classroom any more. Is this reasonable? Personal speaking, I oppose holding such a ridiculous conclusion.

　　In the first place, the feature of teaching defines teachers as an essential part in education. It is well known that teaching is a process of mutual-communication: firstly, teachers impart/initiate knowledge or ideas to students, then students should promptly transfer their feedback to teachers, moreover, teachers will give students the final interpretation according to their specific requirement. Besides, teachers also can (teach students in accordance of their aptitude). In contrast, what computers can do is merely to display materials which have already stored in their EMS memory or mechanically execute operator’s commands. We actually can not image what our education will being if computers substitute teachers totally.

　　As to another reason, it seems that teacher’s role as a supervisor is more and more overt. Computer is indeed a controversy, it not only can be an efficient education assistant, but also can become an addiction which includes too much violent and (pornographic propaganda). Youngsters do not mature fully in psychology, therefore, without teachers' supervision, many children would spend hours playing computer games or surfing unhealthy websites, which are regarded as a waste of valuable time and intelligence, instead of trying to have a good command of knowledge and skills.

　　We never deny that computers are absolutely an available education implements, furthermore, the combination of teacher and computer technology will greatly improve our education quality. However, from all of the grounds of argument mentioned above, we can safely draw a conclusion that teacher will not be replaced by computer in the classroom.

　　范文11

　　Computers nowadays are more and more widely used in education. Hence, some people claim that teachers are no longer playing important roles in the classroom. I completely agree with this statement. Although teacher may be more emotional than computers, the later actually far outdoes in educating students, for the following three reasons.

　　First, it is an undoubted fact that computer are more likely to provide sufficient information to students. Neither a well trained graduate from education institute nor an experienced teacher can offer more knowledge than an advanced computer.

　　Human brain is more suitable for creative activities, but not in conveying information. As a result of the rapid development in technology, the computer’s capacity of containing information will become much stronger.

　　Second, computers are more efficient in educating students than teachers, not only because they will merely make mistakes, but also due to that the will not feel

　　worn out after a long time of work. It goes without saying that teachers are sometimes complained to transfer mistaken messages to students. And the latter, lack of enough related knowledge, finally become the victims of such mistakes. Further more, as they were so tired after a whole day working, teachers are often slow in reaction while asked questions by students. Computers, which can never effected by emotional factors, have no such disadvantages.

　　Last but not least, children are becoming more and more familiar with computers while they are being taught by this new technology. It’s widely accepted that computer has become an essential tool for our daily life. Children could learn how to master it better by the process of being educated by it rather than taking an intentional class presented by a teacher. Classroom, as everybody believes, is a place where students learn knowledge and skills, both academic and practical. So it should be the duty for school to prepare students for the computer-oriented society.

　　All in all, although teachers still contribute to education, we can’t turn a blind eye to the fact that they are not important any more compared to another kind of tutors-computers

　　范文12

　　开头：

　　Along with the mass use of computer technology in education circles, we are delighted to witness the uncountable conveniences be brought by computer. Some people even argue that teacher will not be important in classroom any more. Is this reasonable? Personal speaking, I oppose holding such a ridiculous conclusion.

　　正文：

　　In the first place, the feature of teaching defines teachers as an essential part in education. It is well known that teaching is a process of mutual-communication: firstly, teachers impart/initiate knowledge or ideas to students, then students should promptly transfer their feedback to teachers, moreover, teachers will give students the final interpretation according to their specific requirement. Besides, teachers also can (teach students in accordance of their aptitude). In contrast, what computers can do is merely to display materials which have already stored in their EMS memory or mechanically execute operator’s commands. We actually can not image what our education will being if computers substitute teachers totally.

　　As to another reason, it seems that teacher’s role as a supervisor is more and more overt. Computer is indeed a controversy, it not only can be an efficient education assistant, but also can become an addiction which includes too much violent and (pornographic propaganda). Youngsters do not mature fully in psychology, therefore, without teachers' supervision, many children would spend hours playing computer games or surfing unhealthy websites, which are regarded as a waste of valuable time and intelligence, instead of trying to have a good command of knowledge and skills.

　　结尾：

　　We never deny that computers are absolutely an available education implements, furthermore, the combination of teacher and computer technology will greatly improve our education quality. However, from all of the grounds of argument mentioned above, we can safely draw a conclusion that teacher will not be replaced by computer in the classroom.