名著阅读

"A lie, Watson--a great, big, thumping, obtrusive, uncompromising lie--that's what meets us on the threshold! There is our starting point. The whole story told by Barker is a lie. But Barker's story is corroborated by Mrs. Douglas. Therefore she is lying also. They are both lying, and in a conspiracy. So now we have the clear problem. Why are they lying, and what is the truth which they are trying so hard to conceal? Let us try, Watson, you and I, if we can get behind the lie and reconstruct the truth.
"How do I know that they are lying? Because it is a clumsy fabrication which simply could not be true. Consider! According to the story given to us, the assassin had less than a minute after the murder had been committed to take that ring, which was under another ring, from the dead man's finger, to replace the other ring--a thing which he would surely never have done--and to put that singular card beside his victim. I say that this was obviously impossible.
"You may argue--but I have too much respect for your judgment, Watson, to think that you will do so--that the ring may have been taken before the man was killed. The fact that the candle had been lit only a short time shows that there had been no lengthy interview. Was Douglas, from what we hear of his fearless character, a man who would be likely to give up his wedding ring at such short notice, or could we conceive of his giving it up at all? No, no, Watson, the assassin was alone with the dead man for some time with the lamp lit. Of that I have no doubt at all.
"But the gunshot was apparently the cause of death. Therefore the shot must have been fired some time earlier than we are told. But there could be no mistake about such a matter as that. We are in the presence, therefore, of a deliberate conspiracy upon the part of the two people who heard the gunshot--of the man Barker and of the woman Douglas. When on the top of this I am able to show that the blood mark on the windowsill was deliberately placed there by Barker, in order to give a false clue to the police, you will admit that the case grows dark against him.
"Now we have to ask ourselves at what hour the murder actually did occur. Up to half-past ten the servants were moving about the house; so it was certainly not before that time. At a quarter to eleven they had all gone to their rooms with the exception of Ames, who was in the pantry. I have been trying some experiments after you left us this afternoon, and I find that no noise which MacDonald can make in the study can penetrate to me in the pantry when the doors are all shut.
"It is otherwise, however, from the housekeeper's room. It is not so far down the corridor, and from it I could vaguely hear a voice when it was very loudly raised. The sound from a shotgun is to some extent muffled when the discharge is at very close range, as it undoubtedly was in this instance. It would not be very loud, and yet in the silence of the night it should have easily penetrated to Mrs. Allen's room. She is, as she has told us, somewhat deaf; but none the less she mentioned in her evidence that she did hear something like a door slamming half an hour before the alarm was given. Half an hour before the alarm was given would be a quarter to eleven. I have no doubt that what she heard was the report of the gun, and that this was the real instant of the murder.
"If this is so, we have now to determine what Barker and Mrs. Douglas, presuming that they are not the actual murderers, could have been doing from quarter to eleven, when the sound of the shot brought them down, until quarter past eleven, when they rang the bell and summoned the servants. What were they doing, and why did they not instantly give the alarm? That is the question which faces us, and when it has been answered we shall surely have gone some way to solve our problem."
"I am convinced myself," said I, "that there is an understanding between those two people. She must be a heartless creature to sit laughing at some jest within a few hours of her husband's murder."
"Exactly. She does not shine as a wife even in her own account of what occurred. I am not a whole-souled admirer of womankind, as you are aware, Watson, but my experience of life has taught me that there are few wives, having any regard for their husbands, who would let any man's spoken word stand between them and that husband's dead body. Should I ever marry, Watson, I should hope to inspire my wife with some feeling which would prevent her from being walked off by a housekeeper when my corpse was lying within a few yards of her. It was badly stage-managed; for even the rawest investigators must be struck by the absence of the usual feminine ululation. If there had been nothing else, this incident alone would have suggested a prearranged conspiracy to my mind."
"You think then, definitely, that Barker and Mrs. Douglas are guilty of the murder?"
最后，福尔摩斯点着了烟斗，坐在这家老式乡村旅馆的炉火旁，不慌不忙地，随意地谈起这个案子来，这与其说是深思熟虑的讲述，不如说是自言自语的回忆。
“谎言，华生，是一个很大的、出奇的、不折不扣的弥天大谎，我们一开头就碰到这个谎言，这就是我们的出发点。巴克所说的话完全是撒谎。不过巴克的话被道格拉斯夫人进一步证实了。所以说，道格拉斯夫人也是在撒谎。他们两个都撒谎，而且是串通一起的。所以现在我们的问题很清楚，就是查清楚他们为什么要撒谎？他们千方百计力图隐瞒的真相又是什么？华生，你我两人试试看，能不能查出这些谎言背后的真情。
“我怎么知道他们是在撒谎呢？因为他们捏造得非常笨拙，根本违背了事实。试想一想吧！照他们所说，凶手杀人后，在不到一分钟的时间里从死者手指上摘去这个戒指，而这个戒指上面还套着另一只戒指，然后再把这另一只戒指套回原处——这是他肯定做不到的，还把这张奇怪的卡片放在受害者身旁。我说这显然是办不到的。你也可能会争辩说，那指环也许是在他被害以前被摘下去的。可是，华生，我非常尊重你的判断能力，因此我想你是不会这么说的。蜡烛只点了很短时间，这个事实说明，死者和凶手会面的时间不会很长。我们听说道格拉斯胆量很大，他是那种稍经吓唬就自动交出结婚戒指的人吗？我们能想象他竟然会交出结婚戒指吗？不，不会的，华生，灯点着后，凶手独自一人和死者呆了一段时间。对于这一点，我是深信不疑的。
“不过致死的原因，很明显是枪杀。所以，开枪的时间比他们所说的要早许多。事情经过就是这样，这是决不会错的。因此，我们面临的是一种蓄意合谋，是由两个听到枪声的人，也就是巴克这个男人和道格拉斯夫人这个女人干的。首先，只我能证明窗台上的血迹是巴克故意印上去的，目的是给警方造成假线索时，你也就会承认，这一案件的发展变得对他不利了。
“现在，我们必须向自己提出一个问题：凶杀究竟是在什么时间发生的呢？直到十点半钟，仆人们还在这屋里来来往往，所以谋杀肯定不是在这之前发生的。十点四十五分，仆人们都回到了下处，只有艾姆斯还留在餐具室。你在下午离开我们以后，我曾作过一些试验，发现只要房门都关上，麦克唐纳在书房不管发出多大声音，我在餐具室里也休想听到。
“然而，女管家的卧室就不同了。这间卧室离走廊不远，当声音非常响时，我在这间卧室是可以模模糊糊地听到的。在从极近距离射击时——本案无疑是如此——火枪的枪声在某种程度上消声了，枪声不会很响，但在寂静的夜晚艾伦太太卧室是能听到的。艾伦太太告诉我们她有些耳聋，尽管如此，她还是在证词中提到过，在警报发出前半小时，她听到砰的一声象关门的声音。警报发出前半小时当然是十点四十五分。我确信她听到的就是枪声，那才是真正的行凶时间。
“假如确实如此，我们现在必须查明一个问题：假定巴克先生和道格拉斯夫人不是凶手，那么，十点四十五分他们听到枪声下楼，到十一点一刻他们拉铃叫来仆人为止，这段时间里他们俩都干了些什么。他们在干些什么呢？为什么他们不马上报警呢？这就是摆在我们面前的问题。这个问题一经查明，就向解决问题前进了几步。”
“我也相信，"我说道，“他们两个是串通一起的。道格拉斯夫人在丈夫死后不到几小时，竟然听见笑话就坐在那里哈哈大笑，那她一定是个毫无心肝的东西了。”
“不错。甚至当她自己讲述案情时，也不象个被害人的妻子。华生，我不是一个崇拜女性的人，这一点你是知道的。可是我的生活经验告诉我，那种听了别人的话就不去看她丈夫尸体的妻子，很少是把丈夫放在心上的。华生，要是我娶妻的话，我一定愿意给我妻子灌输一种感情，当我的尸体躺在离她不远的地方时，她决不会随管家妇走开。他们这种安排非常拙劣，即使是最没有经验的侦探，也会因为没有出现通常会有的妇女尖声悲号的场面而感到吃惊的。即使没有其它原因，单凭这件小事也会使我认为这是预谋。”
“那么，你一定认为巴克和道格拉斯夫人就是杀人犯了？”

背景阅读

作者简介：

亚瑟·柯南·道尔（1859——1930）英国杰出的侦探小说家、剧作家。生于苏格兰爱丁堡，父亲是一位政府建工部的公务员。柯南·道尔自幼喜欢文学，中学时任校刊主编。毕业于爱丁堡医科大学，行医10余年，收入仅能维持生活。后专写侦探小说。《血字的研究》几经退稿才发表，以《四签名》闻名于世。1891年弃医从文，遂成侦探小说家。代表作有《波西米亚丑闻》《红发会》、《五个橘核》等。1894年决定停止写侦探小说，在《最后一案》中让福尔摩斯在激流中死去。不料广大读者对此极端愤慨，提出抗议。柯南道尔只得在《空屋》中让福尔摩斯死里逃生，又写出《巴斯克维尔的猎犬》、《恐怖谷》等侦探小说。塑造的福尔摩斯已成为世界上家喻户晓的人物。就连福尔摩斯的办公地点——伦敦贝克街221号B也成了旅游景点。

导言：

伯尔斯通庄园的主人不幸惨遭杀害，死状奇惨无比，头颅几乎被枪击得粉碎，四周血肉模糊，惨不忍睹！尸体旁边留有卡片，上面潦草地写着“V.V.341”的字样。这令案子更为扑朔迷离：这张卡片难道是凶手留下来的吗？它代表什么意义？“恐怖谷”曾令道格拉斯惴惴不安。“恐怖谷”究竟是个怎样的地方？道格拉斯的死与“恐怖谷 ”又有什么关系？
福尔摩斯，侦探的代名词；没有他，就没有侦探文学和侦探文化——新星出版社倾力打造《福尔摩斯探案全集（图注本）》，根据公认最权威英译本重新翻译，配以五百幅原版配图、两千余条专业学者注释、五十余篇延伸阅读、六十篇注释笔记，为中国福迷铸就世界上最权威、最经典的福尔摩斯探案全录。
阿瑟·柯南·道尔（Arthur Conan Doyle，1859—1930），英国著名侦探小说家、剧作家，现代侦探小说的奠基人之一，被誉为“英国侦探小说之父”。