美保障堕胎权法案拟被推翻--为中期选举铺路(下)
日期:2022-05-13 10:00

(单词翻译:单击)

CVD5b+68P7%6%&@iVb1u4!o,x_.U9Q@M

中英文本

dqk]Rl(48!*+K6OV7.Z(

In recent months, the congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol revealed that Ginni Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, had urged President Donald J. Trump’s chief of staff to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

YmfX|ntY[s_gM

近几个月来,国会对2021年1月6日国会山袭击案的调查显示,大法官克拉伦斯·托马斯的妻子金妮·托马斯曾力劝唐纳德·特朗普总统的幕僚长推翻2020年大选的结果Yx*m|^L@|m7y^r|

((S]=AY(1#CW[CBZZf

For decades, Americans have told pollsters roughly two to one that they support a constitutional right to abortion;

=_,jmWaOPq

几十年来,在民意调查中,大约有半数的美国人表示支持宪法赋予的堕胎权利;

ze6862I#)INs

as recently as last week, in a Washington Post-ABC News poll, 54 percent of Americans said Roe should be upheld, compared with 28 percent who wanted justices to reverse it.

E%VjK[kG#i~6

就在上周,在华盛顿邮报-ABC新闻的一项民意调查中,54%的美国人认为罗伊案的判决应该得到支持,相比之下,28%的人希望法官推翻该判决oIipPlH+yTnxb.=[w@c

[ULh_2v;0B.Rl(f(hzt3

When the challenge to Roe — in a case about Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban — was argued in December, and it became clear that five justices were ready then to overrule the decision, Justice Sonia Sotomayor articulated the public’s gathering suspicion.

MN2*0^7[[3~

当对罗伊案的质疑——这是一个关于密西西比州15周堕胎禁令的案件——在12月进行辩论时,很明显有5名法官准备推翻判决,大法官索尼娅·索托马约尔明确表达了公众日益增长的怀疑NYcJ1j,&K-S(D

O;CPtAY%zv7oK-G1

“Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” Justice Sotomayor asked.

Ib]bdYl,^b(*_

“在公众认为宪法及其解读只是政治行为的印象中,这个机构能挺过这种恶臭吗?” 索托马约尔法官问道d9cU3Ktq;Fp+vVVI6on

C[_8jt^5#ha9!6

This week the sense of unease spread from the corridors of power to coffee shops on Main Street.

@ud+lp71K5^W+TOt

本周,不安的感觉从权力走廊蔓延到主街的咖啡馆(oA&b1!#(lT3

EliYP5#yl-G

Even some Republicans expressed alarm at the court after the leaked draft of Justice Alito’s scornful dismissal of Roe.

.b&uoZPO&P

在阿利托法官轻蔑地驳回罗伊案判决的草案泄露后,就连一些共和党人也对最高法院表示了担忧&Www7WuM2n;X.

]A[^aFel.AE

“It rocks my confidence in the court right now,” said Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, one of the few Republicans in the Senate who support abortion rights.

6JHE^B1)BcV^BBA6o7

“这件事现在动摇了我对法院的信心,”来自阿拉斯加州的参议员丽莎·穆尔科斯基说#o#1c8A.jB!3q3W。她是参议院中少数支持堕胎权的共和党人之一wI6@=bEpXGNVk

fHb2RQf+QPxu

Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor, a Republican with a reputation for independence who presides over the Ohio Supreme Court, was particularly taken aback at the spectacle of a leaking scandal at the nation’s highest court.

;]f@tgR%stP#%7)9c

首席大法官莫琳·奥康纳是一位以独立而闻名的共和党人,目前她担任俄亥俄州最高法院的院长h5[2540F4s|%um*8。她对美国最高法院爆出的泄密丑闻尤其感到震惊jPT2K^G[J4Eko7Cs

oTkpq]FjHbR

“I’m not shocked very easily. This shocked me,” she said. “This is just not done.”

&O%3wdi5;LyMviSkr^u

“我不太容易被惊到Dw1M]4=((qaVxZ-3z|Nk。 但这让我很震惊,”她说E#G,5%5Gc21J3NB。 “这还没有实施Ip+)APmgJp。”

EP|%GB55MV|zp~CW+

As Janna Carney, 35, picked up lunch near the downtown Los Angeles office where she works as a creative director in advertising,

![mfDRyc_~;nwC_tn

35岁的詹娜·卡尼在洛杉矶市中心的办公室附近吃午饭,她在那里担任广告创意总监F+[,xTEvYpAlBCm2

%rDx4z&tgp6a.*

she said of the justices, “I liked the idea they couldn’t be owned by anybody, because you can’t vote for them, they’re not running campaigns.”

m4E-BR&iP0

她在谈到大法官时说,“我愿意接受的想法是--他们不归任何人管,因为你不能为他们投票,他们没有竞选活动)CKy@Enj0KzT)6e。”

83,uB#W-gZu49Lse

Now, she said, she has trouble regarding them as neutral arbiters.

s2WO5hIG)vYEFuLHs

她说,现在她很难将他们视为中立的仲裁者=dgPRMt|4OyF[A1~_L

.bS+sxovG)YUL7WnV~Fj

The country seems to have slipped so far into “red team vs. blue team” thinking that “we don’t have these nine impartial judges, we count them as team members,” she said.

uP3(awASZxR]6

她说,这个国家似乎已经陷入了“红队对蓝队”的状态,认为“我们没有这九位不偏不倚的法官,那么我们就把他们视为队员”V7C=f4u(_z4V

jD)P1ZtUqzwNad9u

“It feels like our whole system is crumbling. It feels like we’re Rome and this is the fall.”

D.Dra)@@PfzGl1

“感觉我们的整个体系正在崩溃g_.(Et^I,j4)T5。 感觉我们是罗马,现在是堕落时期MQ^oWoj]rO~k4%|y。”

Z)vZOYA-e&Ip1RTBaT

Others see the same thing, that justices are no longer independent voices who can evolve over time, moving left or right, but akin to a political slate.

C#%kLAA1|V1WA[8gE&Qz

其他人也看到了同样的事情,法官不再是独立的声音,他们可以随着时间的推移而改变,移向左翼或者右翼,但是却类似于一个政治资助(y(t@T]~+=

N1mgQ8EtvXkXr2;v^D,pEP.=~T[]mBY_[Yw(5[E5&kXWDgx
分享到