VOA慢速(翻译+字幕+讲解):外交政策应由国会还是总统控制?
日期:2015-03-15 07:59

(单词翻译:单击)

4sJPZQTJ97BCdSQj4M&5cmfR,plGtZ

听力文本

ct;~aEtd0ah@wOpcwr8!

An open letter to Iran by 47 Republican members of the United States Senate released Monday started a heated debate this week. The question was: Who controls foreign policy -- Congress or the president?

;%tEjNoPA#fO4E]

The letter warned Iran that any deal over its disputed nuclear program with the Obama administration could be overturned. It said that the next U.S. president "could revoke such an executive agreement" and "future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time." Without congressional approval, the letter said, the agreement would be only an executive agreement.

PXM_sazoEG

Lawmakers signing the letter included all but seven of the Republican Party's 54-member majority in the U.S. Senate. They noted that President Barack Obama was leaving office in less than two years, as required by the Constitution. Many of them, they said, might still be in office for many years.

!3wfRYJWp.-AX

Historically, presidents and Congress have argued over their constitutional powers to control foreign policy. Thomas Fleming is a historian who writes about American history. He says America's first president had a strong opinion on the responsibility of the executive branch in foreign policy.

-p|um*%|S!avll8Ai

"Washington's presidency was the strong president personified. He was barely in the chair of the presidency more than a few days and he wrote a letter to all the nations of Europe saying ‘if you want to communicate with the United States of America, write a letter to me, George Washington, not to the Congress.'"

5[Gs7v.9^A5U6O.2qd

President Obama criticized the letter to Iran on Monday. A spokesman for the president, Josh Earnest, told reporters the letter was an attempt to slow down the sensitive negotiations. The U.S. and five other world powers are trying to reach a basic agreement with Iran. The goal is to persuade Iran to give up its program to develop nuclear weapons in return for easing of international sanctions.

L*YSDM1QBz

Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was one of the lawmakers to sign the letter. He defended it, saying he did not know why the administration wanted to keep Congress out of the emerging deal with Iran. He said it was clear that the president did not want Congress to have a part in a deal that could have a big effect on U.S. national security.

#K4#|-=DOl,]lzUn)-

The letter brought strong reactions from former and current diplomatic officials. Democrat Hillary Clinton has served as both a U.S. senator and a U.S. secretary of state. She said the letter was out of step with the best traditions of the Senate.

xaDj]iBA8%Q

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Wednesday that the letter left him in "disbelief."

zQ[#mm-)5^tDzGB

"This risks undermining the confidence that foreign governments in thousands of important agreements commit to between the United States and other countries. And it purports to tell the world that if you want to have any confidence in your dealings with America they have to negotiate with 535 members of Congress."

8jpr[.]n6V(%j3dR

Not all Republican Senators agreed with the letter. Earlier in the week, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker did not think the letter would help to get a bill that would require Congress to advise on a possible nuclear deal with Iran and possibly lifting sanctions at an appropriate time. And Senator Susan Collins of Maine told VOA that she did not think the letter was the right thing to do.

iOa*THFL)V6[XXuf;

Iranian officials also responded to the letter. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the move showed "disintegration" in U.S. politics. Iranian Foreign Minister and chief negotiator Mohammed Javad Zarif dismissed the letter, saying it was of "no legal value."

qBlkHa6vw+%*ZisG0hh.

Talks are set to restart on Sunday. Negotiators are seeking to complete the basic deal by the end of March, with final agreement by the end of June.

u^c#z2PQS5,6xL_MO

Whether the U.S. can reach a nuclear agreement with Iran, one thing is clear. The U.S. Constitution states that the President of the United States "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties."

IhKXd-zXenZ0-RH

I'm Christopher Jones-Cruise.

0VkaeO88ZI,CE%ZR

词汇学习

EXrP+B6ZtJj2^BxIhmCw

1.heated adj. 热的,加热的;热烈的

m(kefbTz57|[Z(

It was a very heated argument and they were shouting at each other...
争论非常激烈,他们相互之间大喊大叫6I0G|f;j!,2socn*NXM

o!f;AI9+u@w]dl9ues

-@&zcNsTcyZhn

2.overturn vt.使垮台,推翻

a066y]tvE2f^UZf~

When the Russian parliament overturned his decision, he backed down...
俄罗斯议会推翻了他的决定,他只好作罢VVpfj2p-|EX7VX

A^ME)TvVy*IQ+T0J.

cRA7(!(=^)~,5|KAhI

3.revoke vt.撤销,取消

.YDC(07gOmtcG2Ej

We hereby revoke the agreement of January 1 st 1982.
我们特此宣告1982年1月1日的协议无效0Vv#leY&OJ(3nOAV*|

YcPhj[g+^05[V0z]Gs0

xI]@la43y|zH%yi

4.modify vt.改变;减轻

FKXfYxBYEa(hGh*P

Established practices are difficult to modify.
既定的惯例是很难更改的LF!tIFN,f7.&4jIl

nH]fYpVE]^

^PTlHKU1wqCcyp1#womQ

5.barely adv.仅仅,勉强

rlT0tXA#)()x

The commission had barely begun to make a dent in the problem.
委员会几乎还没有在这个问题上取得任何进展iM|(u#9RJ(FT&~^CFV

f^Ln8QkU|!~

SJZ8dBmD-_=

6.undermine v. 渐渐破坏

jUmnTr9NaCq=Lu

This crisis has undermined his position.
这场危机已损害了他的低位&e9KH;(sNW

K|#d)mv7uAJdq2wIQ

内容解析

vpo4hs_,+(FDG7pO;VK-

1.Lawmakers signing the letter included all but seven of the Republican Party's 54-member majority in the U.S. Senate.

!fi[ejR;S173

&uDFkzAUYYyIJmI&5

all but几乎, 差不多; 除了…之外(都)

0b)Y,.tPE=%6SD

All but a few will say amen to his proposal.
除了少数几个人外,大家都会十分赞成他的建议H2-&ud~_DRurc

~b^0o^Wf.CikypB|

1v4v]YQy(;

2.A spokesman for the president, Josh Earnest, told reporters the letter was an attempt to slow down the sensitive negotiations.

D^wd=iBlItkdG6aK

L*R4;PNWg_@9.fl2N

slow down(使)慢下来

Zq!FWq].@lSf1_

The car slowed down as they passed Customs...
过海关的时候,车速慢了下来0oi5cAgzBc

Uq37]XB2AnC(

)KP#z=]+%+^6-@Yjq1M8

3.The goal is to persuade Iran to give up its program to develop nuclear weapons in return for easing of international sanctions.

xz0)B;Qz+BQ(d3E7GWMa

42lu@.L8QJhhfa@!jl

in return for作为…的回报

I@r].FQpyupL

I'll sell at a discount in return for a speedy sale.
为了尽快售出,我会打折销售XcxmX9F+PE_le

,~k_s98A@.TcETD

HxQ6]f|xm)GS5@o[

4.She said the letter was out of step with the best traditions of the Senate.

R8|,0BD3WPJJwmd7

c[]do_5h++.MZ#Cy&

out of step with失调

oDM@(BcAN(Z7S-j3[g

This approach is now seriously out of step with the times.
这种方法如今与时代潮流严重脱节ANA!fe!bwDuQLj1Pc

cb6CIylQqIjj9-

Q9rq9D_G~;KN5h18

5.And it purports to tell the world that if you want to have any confidence in your dealings with America they have to negotiate with 535 members of Congress.

=qn+FOf.VxR]

HP6p2[a;~YCOOzL@

purport to声称,意味着

JTm|8^B[V9pePc

Her letter may purport her forthcoming arrival.
她的来信可能意味着她快要到了Pp&b4~pfJk;xZ^

@*OC15S]D#o1eL

参考翻译

!wjjk]cDVM4GUBH

周一发表的美国参议院47位共和党人致伊朗的一封公开信本周引发了激烈争论9q8Y(bdJwoG&lM!9。问题在于:外交政策应该由谁来控制?国会还是总统?

Azon!-f]]z[

该信件警告伊朗,伊朗与奥巴马政府达成的有关有争议的核项目的任何协议都可能被推翻.uK4M*HbR(qcdPhTH]C6。这封公开信表示,“下任美国总统可以撤销这类行政协定”,“未来的国会可以在任何时间修改协定条款”j]~UH7[TZWdELbL#nRLV。如果没有国会批准,这项协定就只能是一项行政协定ys6t^3e6.bhc

jcPD&9QHdJE,h7q9Ixc#

在这份信件上签名的国会议员包括美国参议院共和党多数派54位成员中的47位zl@vg0epmXAl。他们指出,根据宪法要求,奥巴马总统还有不到两年时间就将离任H@@vvP]wI3M]o!9.OH6。而参议员中的大多数还将任职多年QN_[fD]Hc!@L2

i;vM,4&k15z

从历史上看,很多总统和国会针对宪法规定的他们控制外交政策的权利有过争论YzmEGh7Bt4^zY56YBg。Thomas Fleming是一位历史学家,编写美国历史Q4aM)bhfQY+=S=。他说,美国首任总统对行政部门在外交政策上的职责意见非常强硬[OhkJjLnO!.n++fb]

=JWo(iFB*LiL!M,X

“华盛顿在任期间总统就非常强势mQwpqR9wnNuuF,N48E。他宣誓就职总统几天之后就致信欧洲所有国家,‘如果你们想同美利坚合众国交流,写信给我,乔治·华盛顿,而不是写信给国会XyAx#0f;4W5K。’”
周一,奥巴马总统批评了参议院写给伊朗的这封信函nU0LAfaU!]!!f。总统发言人厄内斯特对记者表示,这封信试图延缓敏感的谈判过程Y0uC]7Sv(@G!u%。美国和其它五个世界大国正试图同伊朗达成基本协议-QI[4Qg9gs。我们的目标是说服伊朗放弃其发展核武器的计划,换取国际社会减轻对这个国家的制裁SM2Dv=EBChLjZ1

S%J=YDA&!i]Or1IHZ

参议院多数派领袖,来自肯塔基州的共和党人米切·麦康奈尔(Mitch McConnell)在这封公开信上签名n~MXY5^nt52nEM9。他辩解说,他不知道政府为什么想要将国会排除在即将同伊朗签署的协议之外*P2w[eQ,=-p%_%k+cK。他说,很明显,总统不希望国会在可能对美国国家安全具有重大影响的协议中发挥作用.93!L~+B!M*ruwA1Nd

c-quXkn(88@Lj

这封信引发了前任和现任外交官的强烈反应Kk!D)FLM4tG^)。民主党人希拉里·克林顿(Hillary Clinton)曾经担任美国参议员和美国国务卿;5[D6#YhtBv-*7|Y。她说这封信与参议院的优良传统格格不入8^gx,I1IGwc~

SRRxyz1W|QAVOjOu

美国国务卿约翰·克里(John Kerry)周三表示,这封信让他失去信心7qg&l[[0!aCSYgl

c3UgQXZ)pTG!Lk(bM&CV

“这可能会破坏外国政府对美国和其它国家之间签署的数千份重要协议的信心@o=PJUKBE2*SqEM-。这是在告诉全世界,若要对与美国达成的协议有信心,就必须同535名国会议员谈判vwZ7L8E1Cu。”

9wJwc~U=LFE[jC

并非所有共和党参议员赞同这封公开信=%=v-fWN-Bo8zV。本周早些时候,参议院外交关系委员会主席鲍勃·科克(Bob Corker)认为这封信无助于通过一项法案,要求国会对同伊朗可能签署的核协议和恰当的时候解除制裁提出建议![B,r4v,%Fl(S。缅因州参议员苏珊·柯林斯(Susan Collins)对VOA表示,她不认为这封信做得对JncKqGZuZ(scb]

7s(2&+Ho;7WFSi1h~Xc|

伊朗官员对这封信作出了回应LLPic5ck~tcU。伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊(Ayatollah Ali Khamenei)表示,此举显示了美国政治的分裂HPKzcjige)pOTD[Ap=。伊朗外长和首席谈判代表扎里夫(Mohammed Javad Zarif)对这封信不屑一顾,他说,这封信“没有任何法律价值”WP06kgSrEX)Y9

+pmksC(=VS!ZTS%x

会谈将于周日重启9mex1ADYe%W0z)7xpab。谈判人员正希望在三月底前达成基本协议,在六月底达成最终协议..pUpx3p]+#

S4.i.KVO+A

无论美国是否能同伊朗达成核协议,有一点很清楚q1d[et6m[biNsOs^bs。美国宪法规定,“美国总统有权在争取参议院的意见和同意的情况下签署条约.iuHkgAYt~_dCKbGH。”

1^-eq),K|s9I

我是Christopher Jones-CruisebR|Xsl6T0L%

XF1+XX%;EJ

VOA慢速英文文本来自51VOA,译文由可可原创,未经许可请勿转载,TkJh9FUJBG@1Hjvj*X

Q|(WPB)N;0Kfc5GGfm.o5Ioze&(kYV~qw9!3(!XW&+%^&My
分享到