The Darwin-Wallace presentation was one of seven that evening — one of the others was on the flora of Angola — and if the thirty or so people in the audience had any idea that they were witnessing the scientific highlight of the century, they showed no sign of it. No discussion followed. Nor did the event attract much notice elsewhere. Darwin cheerfully later noted that only one person, a Professor Haughton of Dublin, mentioned the two papers in print and his conclusion was "that all that was new in them was false, and what was true was old."
达尔文一华莱士的论文是那天晚上提交的7篇论文中的一篇——其他6篇文章中，有一篇是研究安哥拉的植物区系的——列席会议的听众大约有30名。即使他们意识到自己正目睹那一世纪科学领域最激动人心的时刻，他们也没有表现出来。接下来并没有讨论，在社会上也没有激起多大反响。达尔文后来高兴地注意到，只有一个人在文章中提到了这两篇论文，他是都柏林一位名叫豪夫顿的教授。他的结论是：“在这两篇文章中，凡是新的内容都是荒谬的，凡是旧的内容都是正确的。”

Wallace, still in the distant East, learned of these maneuverings long after the event, but was remarkably equable and seemed pleased to have been included at all. He even referred to the theory forever after as "Darwinism." Much less amenable to Darwin's claim of priority was a Scottish gardener named Patrick Matthew who had, rather remarkably, also come up with the principles of natural selection — in fact, in the very year that Darwin had set sail in the Beagle. Unfortunately, Matthew had published these views in a book called Naval Timber and Arboriculture, which had been missed not just by Darwin, but by the entire world. Matthew kicked up in a lively manner, with a letter to Gardener's Chronicle, when he saw Darwin gaining credit everywhere for an idea that really was his. Darwin apologized without hesitation, though he did note for the record: "I think that no one will feel surprised that neither I, nor apparently any other naturalist, has heard of Mr. Matthew's views, considering how briefly they are given, and they appeared in the Appendix to a work on Naval Timber and Arboriculture."
华莱士当时仍在远东，过了好久他才知道这一切，他表现得很平静，似乎对能够被列入进化论的发现者之列而感到十分高兴。他此后甚至一直将这个理论称之为“达尔文主义”。还有一个人对达尔文最先发现进化论的资格构成了大得多的威胁，这人名叫帕特里克·马修，是苏格兰的一名园艺师。令人吃惊的是，他事实上远在达尔文开始“贝格尔”号之航的同一年就提出了自然选择理论。不幸的是，他是在一本名为《海军用木和森林栽培》的书里提出这些观点的。不仅达尔文没有读到，全世界都没有注意到。当他看见达尔文被所有人推崇为进化论的发现者，而这一理论事实上是他最早提出的时候，他马上采取行动，给《艺园者纪事》写了一封信。达尔文毫不犹豫地表示了歉意，不过他同时也声明说：“我想任何人都不会感到吃惊，无论是我，还是任何别的搏物学家，都没有听说过马修先生的观点，因为他的话讲得很简单，又是出现在一本关于《海军用木和森林栽培》的作品的附录里。”